# geopulse vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 464 | 4 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +131 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse and wanderer score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.

wanderer is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-wanderer