# geopulse vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 93 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +1 264 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-uptime-kuma