# geopulse vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 29 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 29 for Umbraco CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-umbraco-cms