# geopulse vs Tile38

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | Tile38 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #2 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 1 464 | 9 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tile38 scores 66/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Tile38.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [Tile38](https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-tile38