# geopulse vs sms

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | sms |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #11 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 8.0.0 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse scores 64/100 against 48/100 for sms, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for sms.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; sms needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [sms](https://selfhost.directory/project/sms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-sms