# geopulse vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 1 464 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-sdnext