# geopulse vs Redash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 28 851 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Redash scores 76/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-redash