# geopulse vs RAWGraphs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | RAWGraphs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 9 047 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse and RAWGraphs score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RAWGraphs.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; RAWGraphs needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [RAWGraphs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rawgraphs-app) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rawgraphs-app.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-rawgraphs-app