geopulsevsRAWGraphs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| geopulse | RAWGraphs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 9 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
geopulse and RAWGraphs score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RAWGraphs.
If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; RAWGraphs needs more configuration.
geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).
geopulse details →RAWGraphs details →