# geopulse vs photon-docker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | photon-docker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #5 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 ✓ | 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.5.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse scores 64/100 against 48/100 for photon-docker, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for photon-docker.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; photon-docker needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [photon-docker](https://selfhost.directory/project/photon-docker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photon-docker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-photon-docker