geopulsevsOpenTripPlanner
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| geopulse | OpenTripPlanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #4 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 1 464 | 2 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Java | Java |
Which one should you pick?
geopulse and OpenTripPlanner score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenTripPlanner.
If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; OpenTripPlanner needs more configuration.
geopulse is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
geopulse details →OpenTripPlanner details →