# geopulse vs Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #1 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 8 181 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +76 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM).

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-source-routing-machine-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-open-source-routing-machine-osrm