Gaseous ServervsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gaseous Server | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Gaming | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 954 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Zero-K scores 62/100 against 55/100 for Gaseous Server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Gaseous Server needs more configuration.
Zero-K is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
Gaseous Server details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Gaseous Server, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with