# Garmin Grafana vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Garmin Grafana | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 523 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 4 Jun 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Garmin Grafana scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Garmin Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Garmin Grafana is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Garmin Grafana is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Garmin Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/garmin-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/garmin-grafana.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/garmin-grafana-vs-windows-arm