# Garmin Grafana vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Garmin Grafana | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 525 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 4 Jun 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Garmin Grafana scores 67/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

Garmin Grafana ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, Garmin Grafana is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

Garmin Grafana is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Garmin Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/garmin-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/garmin-grafana.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/garmin-grafana-vs-tunesynctool