# garm vs harness

> Two self-hosted [CI/CD projects](https://selfhost.directory/cicd), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | garm | harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 28 in CI/CD | #3 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 38 752 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +318 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.1 · 8 May 2026 ✓ | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

harness scores 80/100 against 51/100 for garm, so it is the safer default.

harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for garm.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; garm needs more configuration.

harness is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [garm](https://selfhost.directory/project/garm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/garm.md)
- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/garm-vs-harness