garmvsGitea
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| garm | Gitea | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 58 747 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +607 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.2.1 · 8 May 2026 | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Gitea scores 89/100 against 51/100 for garm, so it is the safer default.
Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for garm.
If you want the quickest setup, Gitea is easier to run; garm needs more configuration.
Gitea is growing faster right now (+607 stars in 30 days).