# gaps vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gaps | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #70 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 577 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 49/100 for gaps, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for gaps.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gaps](https://selfhost.directory/project/gaps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gaps.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gaps-vs-openreader