# FusionAuth vs Kong Gateway

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FusionAuth | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 240 | 44 317 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 49/100 for FusionAuth, so it is the safer default.

Kong Gateway ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for FusionAuth.

Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FusionAuth](https://selfhost.directory/project/fusionauth-containers) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fusionauth-containers.md)
- [Kong Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kong-gateway.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fusionauth-containers-vs-kong-gateway