FusionAuthvsKanidm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FusionAuth | Kanidm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 3 in IAM |
| GitHub stars | 240 | 5 512 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Proprietary | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Kanidm scores 67/100 against 49/100 for FusionAuth, so it is the safer default.
Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for FusionAuth.
If you want the quickest setup, FusionAuth is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.
Kanidm is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
FusionAuth details →Kanidm details →
Swap a project
Keep FusionAuth, compare it with
Keep Kanidm, compare it with