# fugleramme vs go2rtc

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fugleramme | go2rtc |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 104 in Home Automation | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 952 | 14 522 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +276 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.29.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 63/100 for fugleramme, so it is the safer default.

fugleramme ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; fugleramme needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fugleramme](https://selfhost.directory/project/fugleramme) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fugleramme.md)
- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fugleramme-vs-go2rtc