FSCrawlervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted Document Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FSCrawler | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 455 | 45 106 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 686 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 37 |
| Latest release | fscrawler-3.0 · 26 Aug 2026 | forme-native-v0.0.0-f7a5ce86fcfafb330e8f8b0b05a9403e132f0185bf7b74ef8ff411dedf05ceb9 · 30 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | — | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 27/100 for FSCrawler, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for FSCrawler.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 686 stars in 30 days).
FSCrawler details →Reactive Resume details →All Document Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep FSCrawler, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with