# frp vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | frp | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Proxy | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 110 277 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +666 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.71.1 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

frp scores 85/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

frp ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; frp needs more configuration.

frp is growing faster right now (+666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [frp](https://selfhost.directory/project/frp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frp.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frp-vs-url-to-png