# frp vs harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | frp | harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Proxy | #3 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 110 277 ✓ | 38 755 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +666 ✓ | +321 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.71.1 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

frp scores 85/100 against 80/100 for harness, so it is the safer default.

frp ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.

If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; frp needs more configuration.

frp is growing faster right now (+666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [frp](https://selfhost.directory/project/frp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frp.md)
- [harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frp-vs-harness