Frostbasevssupabase
Two self-hosted Firebase alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Frostbase | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 241 | 114 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 47/100 for Frostbase, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Frostbase.
If you want the quickest setup, Frostbase is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
Frostbase details →supabase details → All Firebase alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Frostbase, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with