# Frostbase vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted [Firebase alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/firebase), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Frostbase | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 241 | 25 399 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Frostbase, so it is the safer default.

SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Frostbase.

SpacetimeDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Frostbase](https://selfhost.directory/project/frostbase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frostbase.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frostbase-vs-spacetimedb