# frigate_plate_recognizer vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted [Video Surveillance projects](https://selfhost.directory/video-surveillance), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | frigate_plate_recognizer | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 184 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.4.0 · 2 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 46/100 for frigate_plate_recognizer, so it is the safer default.

frigate_plate_recognizer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, frigate_plate_recognizer is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [frigate_plate_recognizer](https://selfhost.directory/project/frigateplaterecognizer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frigateplaterecognizer.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frigateplaterecognizer-vs-shinobi