# frigate_plate_recognizer vs go2rtc

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | frigate_plate_recognizer | go2rtc |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 14 521 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +275 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.4.0 · 2 Jun 2026 | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 46/100 for frigate_plate_recognizer, so it is the safer default.

frigate_plate_recognizer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; frigate_plate_recognizer needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [frigate_plate_recognizer](https://selfhost.directory/project/frigateplaterecognizer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frigateplaterecognizer.md)
- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frigateplaterecognizer-vs-go2rtc