# Frigate vs globalping-probe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Frigate | globalping-probe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 37 047 ✓ | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +966 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.18.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Frigate scores 84/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Frigate.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Frigate needs more configuration.

Frigate is growing faster right now (+966 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Frigate](https://selfhost.directory/project/frigate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frigate.md)
- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/frigate-vs-globalping-probe