# FreshRSS vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FreshRSS | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 16 438 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +312 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

FreshRSS scores 79/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

FreshRSS ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

FreshRSS is growing faster right now (+312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FreshRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freshrss-vs-sdnext