# FreshRSS vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FreshRSS | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 16 438 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +304 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 79/100 for FreshRSS, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for FreshRSS.

If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FreshRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freshrss-vs-llamacpp