FreshRSSvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FreshRSS | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 16 438 | 132 699 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +304 | +3 244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1467 |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 79/100 for FreshRSS, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for FreshRSS.
If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
FreshRSS details →llama.cpp details →