# FreshRSS vs html2rss

> Two self-hosted [Feed Reader projects](https://selfhost.directory/feed-reader), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FreshRSS | html2rss |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #27 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 16 437 ✓ | 194 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.14.5 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

FreshRSS scores 79/100 against 50/100 for html2rss, so it is the safer default.

html2rss ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for FreshRSS.

If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; html2rss needs more configuration.

FreshRSS is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FreshRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss.md)
- [html2rss](https://selfhost.directory/project/html2rss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/html2rss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freshrss-vs-html2rss