FreshRSSvshtml2rss
Two self-hosted Feed Reader projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FreshRSS | html2rss | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #27 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 16 437 | 194 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.14.5 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
FreshRSS scores 79/100 against 50/100 for html2rss, so it is the safer default.
html2rss ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for FreshRSS.
If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; html2rss needs more configuration.
FreshRSS is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
FreshRSS details →html2rss details →All Feed Reader projects →