# Freqtrade vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Freqtrade | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 56 110 | 89 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 | +2 388 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.9 · 29 Sept 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Freqtrade and World Monitor score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Freqtrade.

If you want the quickest setup, Freqtrade is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Freqtrade](https://selfhost.directory/project/freqtrade) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freqtrade.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freqtrade-vs-world-monitor