# Freqtrade vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Freqtrade | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 56 122 ✓ | 4 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +449 ✓ | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.9 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Freqtrade scores 86/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

Freqtrade ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Freqtrade needs more configuration.

Freqtrade is growing faster right now (+449 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Freqtrade](https://selfhost.directory/project/freqtrade) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freqtrade.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freqtrade-vs-motioneye