FreeSWITCHvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FreeSWITCH | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in VoIP | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 45 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +1 666 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.11.3 · 28 Aug 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 69/100 for FreeSWITCH, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for FreeSWITCH.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; FreeSWITCH needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).
FreeSWITCH details →Reactive Resume details →