# FreeSWITCH vs Playerr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FreeSWITCH | Playerr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in VoIP | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 261 ✓ | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.11.3 · 28 Aug 2026 ✓ | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

FreeSWITCH scores 69/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.

Playerr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for FreeSWITCH.

If you want the quickest setup, Playerr is easier to run; FreeSWITCH needs more configuration.

FreeSWITCH is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FreeSWITCH](https://selfhost.directory/project/freeswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freeswitch.md)
- [Playerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/freeswitch-vs-playerr