# free-games-claimer-remaster vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | free-games-claimer-remaster | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 476 | 132 699 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1465 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.18 · 21 Oct 2026 | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 52/100 for free-games-claimer-remaster, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for free-games-claimer-remaster.

If you want the quickest setup, free-games-claimer-remaster is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [free-games-claimer-remaster](https://selfhost.directory/project/free-games-claimer-remaster) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/free-games-claimer-remaster.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/free-games-claimer-remaster-vs-llamacpp