# FossFLOW vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FossFLOW | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Diagramming | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 226 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.

FossFLOW ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FossFLOW](https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fossflow-vs-wbo