# FossFLOW vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FossFLOW | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Diagramming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 226 | 114 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 551 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for FossFLOW.

If you want the quickest setup, FossFLOW is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FossFLOW](https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fossflow-vs-supabase