# FossFLOW vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FossFLOW | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Diagramming | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 226 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.5 · 7 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 47/100 for FossFLOW, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for FossFLOW.

If you want the quickest setup, FossFLOW is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FossFLOW](https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fossflow.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fossflow-vs-nocodb