fosscordvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fosscord | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 110 in Chat | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 720 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
fosscord and Zero-K score the same (62/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; fosscord needs more configuration.
Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
fosscord details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep fosscord, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with