fosscordvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fosscord | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 110 in Chat | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 720 | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 62/100 for fosscord, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; fosscord needs more configuration.
fosscord is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
fosscord details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep fosscord, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with