fosscordvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| fosscord | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 110 in Chat | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 6 720 | 132 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +3 234 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1464 |
| Latest release | — | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 62/100 for fosscord, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for fosscord.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; fosscord needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
fosscord details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep fosscord, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with