FoodsoftvsKoffan
Two self-hosted Food & Agriculture projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Foodsoft | Koffan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 11 in Food & Agriculture | #4 of 11 in Food & Agriculture |
| GitHub stars | 359 | 819 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 23 |
| Latest release | v4.9.2 · 28 Jun 2026 | v2.17.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Koffan scores 56/100 against 51/100 for Foodsoft, so it is the safer default.
Koffan ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Foodsoft.
If you want the quickest setup, Koffan is easier to run; Foodsoft needs more configuration.
Koffan is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).
Foodsoft details →Koffan details →All Food & Agriculture projects →
Swap a project
Keep Foodsoft, compare it with
Keep Koffan, compare it with