# fogproject vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fogproject | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Backup Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 690 | 93 024 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +1 277 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.5.10.2518 · 11 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 63/100 for fogproject, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for fogproject.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; fogproject needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 277 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fogproject](https://selfhost.directory/project/fogproject) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fogproject.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fogproject-vs-uptime-kuma