# FlyReq Image Studio vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted [AI projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlyReq Image Studio | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #74 of 125 in AI | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 164 | 393 265 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 917 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.0.12 · 25 Sept 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 45/100 for FlyReq Image Studio, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for FlyReq Image Studio.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 917 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlyReq Image Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flyreq-image-studio-vs-openclaw