# FlyReq Image Studio vs Ollama

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlyReq Image Studio | Ollama |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 95/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #74 of 125 in AI | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 164 | 185 138 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 590 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 50 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.0.12 · 25 Sept 2026 | v0.40.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Ollama scores 95/100 against 45/100 for FlyReq Image Studio, so it is the safer default.

Ollama ships more often: 50 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for FlyReq Image Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; FlyReq Image Studio needs more configuration.

Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 590 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlyReq Image Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio.md)
- [Ollama](https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flyreq-image-studio-vs-ollama