# FlyReq Image Studio vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FlyReq Image Studio | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #74 of 125 in AI | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 164 | 132 646 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1457 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.0.12 · 25 Sept 2026 | b11968 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 45/100 for FlyReq Image Studio, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1457 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for FlyReq Image Studio.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FlyReq Image Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flyreq-image-studio.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/flyreq-image-studio-vs-llamacpp